Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 12:23

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Winners, losers from NASCAR Cup race at Nashville won by Ryan Blaney - NBC Sports
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How can I get thousands of likes on TikTok?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Voyager IPO: Stock Rockets 84% Higher in Trading Debut - Barron's
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
In my experience, British people are fat, ugly and arrogant. Why is it and can it be changed?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Are there any Indian wife swapping stories?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Week in Review: Perplexity Labs wants to do your work - TechCrunch
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Former Packers WR makes long touchdown in UFL championship - Acme Packing Company
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Summer Game Fest 2025 LIVE: Everything announced during the gaming showcase - Tom's Guide
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Neanderthals Spread Across Asia With Surprising Speed—and Now We Know How - Gizmodo